Categories

  • Annual Top 10 Developments (1)
  • Awards / Announcements (6)
  • Damages (25)
  • Discipline (17)
  • Harassment (35)
  • Hiring (20)
  • Investigations (25)
  • Occupational Health and Safety (22)
  • Policies (22)
  • Presentations (15)
  • Privacy (4)
  • Summary Judgment (4)
  • The Latest Chapter in Employment Law (12)
  • Uncategorized (15)
Rudner MacDonald - Toronto Employment Law Firm
info@rudnermacdonald.com
F: 647-723-1133

Two Bloor West
2 Bloor Street West, Ste 1005
Toronto, Ontario M4W 3E2
P: 416-640-6402

Parkway Corporate Center
100 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600
Markham, Ontario, L3R 6H3
P: 289-317-1300

Contact

So What Happens If We Don’t Comply With Bill 132?

As my recent Canadian HR Law blog post outlines, in September of last year, Bill 132 came into force in Ontario. The Bill, formally known as the Sexual Violence And Harassment Action Plan Act, follows substantial legislative changes pursuant to Bill 168, which took effect almost seven years ago.

Both pieces of legislation are intended to bolster protection for employees with regard to harassment, sexual harassment, and bullying. Like Bill 168, Bill 132 includes proactive requirements. In other words, it not only creates potential liability for specific incidents, but also requires that employers take positive actions. In particular, employers must amend their harassment policies to specify

  • how and to whom harassment is to be reported and provide for reporting to someone other than the employer if the harasser is the employer or supervisor of the complainant;
  • how allegations will be investigated and dealt with;
  • how confidential information will be treated (and, particularly, provide that information will not be disclosed unless it is necessary to do so for purposes of the investigation or discipline; and
  • how the complainant and accused will be advised of the outcome of the investigation and any corrective action to be taken.

Back when Bill 168 came into existence, we warned our employer clients of the perils of a failure to comply. As we saw, the Ministry of Labour allowed a brief grace period, but quickly bolstered its team of Inspectors and began engaging in a campaign of enforcement.

When incidents have arisen and organizations have been found to have been in breach of their Bill 168 obligations, significant penalties have been imposed. For example:

In both of these cases, employees were attacked by “clients” of the organization. And in both cases, the organization had not complied with its obligations pursuant to Bill 132. That is why they pled guilty.

It should be kept in mind that the true costs to the organization were far greater than the extensive fines. They also incurred substantial legal fees, embarrassing publicity, and the costs of remedying the damage created by the incidents in question.

There is no reason to believe that failing to abide by the obligations of Bill 132 will be treated any differently. The Ministry will begin its enforcements mechanisms and, in the event of incidents, will immediately ask for proof of compliance. Where that is lacking, the organization will be exposed to additional liability. To avoid this, employers should take immediate steps to comply with Bill 132 (and Bill 168 if they have not already done so). Policies, programs and procedures must be updated.

Many employers choose to bury their heads in the proverbial sand and hope these legislative changes go away. While they may be frustrated by the seemingly never-ending obligations, they cannot opt-out without exposing themselves to liability. The best practice when in doubt is to consult an employment lawyer.

By Stuart Rudner


RudnerMacDonaldADButton